Below you can see all 406 of our posts:
Expand All
- March 2013 (1)
- 20: Airpark database open for all (4)
- February 2013 (1)
- 12: N.C.’s Mountain Air in the news (0)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (3)
- June 2012 (2)
- 04: Airpark insurance… is it required? (1)
- 07: Recreational Use Statute follow-up (2)
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (2)
- November 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- 27: Flying high: A bird’s-eye view (0)
- August 2011 (4)
- 08: They feel… lucky! (0)
- 10: Glacier destroys Super Cub (0)
- 30: Charlotte Observer: Some think planes are best way to travel (0)
- 31: Can’t see the forest for the trees (0)
- July 2011 (5)
- 13: Interview becomes part of the story (0)
- 14: Falmouth Airpark home one WCVB TV Boston (0)
- 20: Dave Sclair update + AirVenture forum (0)
- 26: WSJ: ‘The Sky’s The Limit’ (0)
- 27: Godspeed Dad (3)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (3)
- 04: Looking for Nevada-based agent (2)
- 05: Question: Landholder limited liability, really? (1)
- 25: German airpark now online (0)
- March 2011 (6)
- 07: Looking for hangar interior ideas (4)
- 09: Phuket Airpark to bring new meaning to ‘flying home’ (0)
- 17: Looking for apartment floor plans (1)
- 17: EAA: FAA Releases Interim Residential TTF Policy (0)
- 27: Sessions to host SUN ‘n FUN forum (0)
- 28: Brady Landing Airpark – best kept secret on the East Coast (8)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (3)
- 01: Mohican Airpark gets some nice press (0)
- 28: Anyone have experience with… (2)
- 30: Subgrade and drainage are key (0)
- November 2010 (2)
- 09: Visit us at AOPA Summit (0)
- 22: Mohican Airpark cleared for development (0)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (9)
- 03: AOPA: FAA hints at details of upcoming through-the-fence proposal (0)
- 10: AOPA Online: FAA to uphold existing through-the-fence access (0)
- 16: Three questions from Texas reader (3)
- 20: Word is spreading on TTF changes (0)
- 20: Watch EAA webinar (0)
- 21: Watch TTF hearing on web (0)
- 22: Story is laughably one sided (0)
- 22: Watch today’s TTF hearing (0)
- 28: Waypoint files for conditional use permit (1)
- August 2010 (4)
- 04: Nice airpark story in Plane & Pilot (0)
- 16: Mohican Airpark (Ohio) takes first step (1)
- 18: Sign up for free airpark webinar (2)
- 19: Do you own this home? (1)
- July 2010 (6)
- 01: Airpark accident survey (0)
- 06: Survey closing soon (0)
- 07: Question: Landing rights not attached to airpark parcels (1)
- 08: Arlington fly-in forum on Saturday (0)
- 15: Telford Skypark, England, failed to develop (0)
- 21: No airpark is too small for directory (0)
- June 2010 (6)
- 06: Help us track airpark home sales data (0)
- 07: Non-profit in the works for future airpark (0)
- 14: Photo Essay: STL Metro East (0)
- 15: Airpark details survey (0)
- 16: New New Zealand airpark in permitting stage (0)
- 29: Interesting statistic on taxes (0)
- May 2010 (5)
- 05: Share your airpark home with us (0)
- 06: 18 hangar homes to be auctioned live on RFDTV (2)
- 10: FAA getting more flexible? (0)
- 13: Photo Essay: Hardee Airpark, SC (0)
- 24: Airpark home financial survey (1)
- April 2010 (5)
- 02: TTF efforts bearing fruit; leader deserves praise (0)
- 07: Potential for an airpark? (1)
- 09: Blue Bear Flys (0)
- 15: Possible panhandle airpark (0)
- 18: Doctors flying visits (0)
- March 2010 (9)
- 03: High-end Reno-area home on the market (0)
- 04: Any questions for my Sun ‘n Fun forum? (0)
- 08: Big South Fork Airpark completes development phase (0)
- 11: Specific TTF input needed immediately (0)
- 15: New legislation to correct FAA policy (2)
- 17: Residents near Chandler airport worry little about safety (0)
- 19: HeraldNet: County considers rules to protect ‘airparks’ from complaints (0)
- 25: HeraldNet: County Council tries to preserve area’s last airpark (0)
- 25: Working group focused on preserving residential TTF (0)
- February 2010 (6)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (7)
- 03: Question: How about a 2nd airpark home … in Canada (1)
- 04: Question: Any lenders specializing in airpark property? (5)
- 07: Our opposition to the FAAs Compliance Guidance Letter (2)
- 16: Independence airpark balks at FAA rule (0)
- 18: New FAA Policy Adversely Affects All Airports (1)
- 22: Airpark Land Ownership vs. HOA (2)
- 23: AOPA Online: Flexibility needed for through-the-fence access (0)
- November 2009 (11)
- 09: FAA’s Lang to receive UNO award (0)
- 09: New Organization Fights FAA’s Hangar Home Directive (0)
- 11: Idaho’s SilverWing airpark a buyout target? (1)
- 12: What is ‘through the fence’? (0)
- 13: Letter: Need some help with COMPS (11)
- 16: Add Scott County to TTF-troubled list (1)
- 17: Airpark coming to Monroe, Georgia (1)
- 18: Ramblings from AOPA Aviation Summit (2)
- 19: Tillsonburgnews.com: Runway extension creates opportunity (0)
- 19: EAA seeks TTF comments (1)
- 20: Free lot available (2)
- October 2009 (7)
- 02: A home at Roche Harbor (0)
- 02: NATA finds FAA inconsistencies (0)
- 19: Preliminary plat approved for Texas airpark (2)
- 26: Daily Camera: Erie, Air Park residents disagree on runway removal (0)
- 27: Ruby Star Airpark developer bankrupt (0)
- 28: Wickenburg Sun: Aguila fights burglaries in Eagle Roost (0)
- 29: YouTube clips explains thru-the-fence impact (2)
- September 2009 (5)
- 21: Letter from FAA on thru-the-fence (2)
- 22: Our thoughts on FAA’s TTF position (6)
- 23: Airports presently facing TTF issues (2)
- 28: Progress? Hopefully (0)
- 29: Letter: Looking for development sources? (4)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (8)
- 09: AOPA calling for ‘greater flexibility’ on TTF issue (0)
- 12: FAA threatening airports with TTF pacts (5)
- 15: An example of good press (0)
- 21: Sample Air Avigation Easement (2)
- 21: Extreme airpark(?) living (0)
- 21: Letter: Non-funded airports under FAA reach (2)
- 25: Evans Head, Australia airpark moving forward (1)
- 31: FAA’s long-standing policy against thru the fence agreements booed at Oshkosh (5)
- June 2009 (9)
- 01: Pegasus Airpark trying to stem foreclosure tide (9)
- 02: Writer seeks clarification on Florida valuations (2)
- 03: Airpark amenities (2)
- 04: Letter: Soil advice? (4)
- 09: Down Under airpark taking off (1)
- 12: Got a recent photo of your airpark? (1)
- 16: Appraiser seeks info on sales of airparks (2)
- 18: Airpark permit denied in Arizona (2)
- 28: Foreclosure option for failing to pay HOA fees (1)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (8)
- 07: Three Sun ‘n Fun forums on airparks planned (1)
- 09: Fill out airpark survey now; it closes April 15 (0)
- 09: Ex Ottawa military field becoming residential airpark (0)
- 14: A victory for developer (0)
- 15: Whiteplains Plantation seeing hike in activity (0)
- 15: KearneyHub.com: Still no airpark decision (0)
- 17: Interesting data in real estate survey (0)
- 29: Writer seeks info on chip-sealing gravel runway (6)
- March 2009 (12)
- 02: Correct terms help get ‘hangar home’ OK (0)
- 04: Airpark project gets OK; foes vow to appeal (0)
- 07: Check out airpark self-certification plan before Homeland Security mandates something (5)
- 11: Geelong, Australia, to get residential airpark (4)
- 16: Spring’s coming … airparks need work! (0)
- 20: Who’s responsible for damage to plane? (1)
- 20: Arizona airpark project under investigation (0)
- 22: Real Estate Activity Survey (13)
- 24: Bank offers lots adjoining New Jersey airport (2)
- 26: Links list updated; do you have website? (2)
- 26: Don’t forget to complete residential airpark survey (0)
- 31: Real estate survey will close soon (1)
- February 2009 (6)
- 02: Assisted living for retired pilot available (0)
- 04: Bangkok’s Best Ocean Airpark featured (0)
- 16: What to do about those not paying (2)
- 22: Residential airpark plan tabled (0)
- 24: Technology in airpark homes (0)
- 28: Permit needed for fuel tank deliveries (0)
- January 2009 (8)
- 04: Evans airport future up in the air (0)
- 07: Plane Living (0)
- 08: Board sides with city on land-use issue (1)
- 13: Two airparks in development in Thailand (3)
- 14: Profile of Independence Airpark resident (2)
- 15: ‘The dream is an air park’ in New Jersey (0)
- 29: Fly the ‘Golf Golden Triangle’ (2)
- 30: Question: What’s future of airparks? (2)
- December 2008 (7)
- 02: Can a homeowner call a general meeting to discuss activity by the current board? (0)
- 02: Insurance for an airpark in development (0)
- 14: NY Times spotlights hangar homes for sale (0)
- 15: Hensley Airpark makes the news (0)
- 16: Want to help start an airpark near Atlanta? (2)
- 17: More pics from Hensley Airpark (2)
- 23: Bankrate.com runs airpark story (0)
- November 2008 (10)
- 05: LWYP survey helps save nearly $1,000 (3)
- 14: Photos added to Airpark Directory (0)
- 17: Sandy Creek Airpark Auction (1)
- 17: FAA’s directive threatens runway access at airpark (1)
- 18: Airpark asks council to reconsider jet provision (0)
- 19: Town of Lacombe delays its housing project (0)
- 19: New photo, website for Whiteplains Plantation (1)
- 21: New photos of The Landings on Monkey Island (0)
- 24: Survey of association fees (1)
- 26: Naples Daily News: ‘In The Know’ column enlightens (0)
- October 2008 (14)
- 01: Airparks in Illinois (0)
- 07: Question: Homes, hangars and horses (10)
- 13: Difference between airpark and airport (0)
- 13: Airport noise a concern for Q.C. community (0)
- 15: Question: Optimum airpark lot/size (3)
- 16: Jet plan for Queen Creek airpark grounded (2)
- 16: Chipola Airpark subdivision plan expands (0)
- 23: Oregon city, Port at odds over airport related zone (0)
- 23: Owner association information (0)
- 27: Huffington Post reports on Santa Paula airpark project (0)
- 27: Proposed 15,000 home development near airpark (0)
- 29: Question: Best airpark organization [legal] (1)
- 30: Santa Paula hangar-condo project gets more press (0)
- 30: Old agreement causing headaches in Boulder (0)
- September 2008 (12)
- 02: Airpark development in New Zealand (0)
- 08: QC residents should come before jets (0)
- 08: Dayton Airpark projects take flight (0)
- 09: Airparks in Idaho (3)
- 09: Results from airpark buying & selling survey (2)
- 15: Airport project faces vote (0)
- 17: Fort Collins-Loveland Airport future is OK’d by city (0)
- 17: Question: Non-airpark neighbors concerns (1)
- 24: Question: Know of any county leases? (0)
- 25: Thank you for adding map (0)
- 25: HOA Sues Resident Over Paint Color (0)
- 25: A developer looking for partners (5)
- August 2008 (7)
- 04: Pecan Plantation noted in local paper (0)
- 05: Airparks info: Georgia (1)
- 12: Q&A: Runway legal/tax issues (0)
- 18: New Airpark for Brunswick County (1)
- 19: Q&A: Non-U.S. airparks (0)
- 28: Airport Commission recommends access fee (1)
- 29: Big South Fork Airpark now open (0)
- July 2008 (12)
- 01: Q&A: First time airpark buyer’s questions (0)
- 05: Good magazine article on residential airparks (0)
- 08: Airparks info: California (3)
- 14: Q&A – Liability insurance (0)
- 14: HomerNews.com – Airstrip coming to Diamond Ridge (0)
- 15: Q&A – Auditing association records (0)
- 18: Going ’round in circles with Carousel Condos (3)
- 21: Property stumbling blocks hold up potential air park (0)
- 21: Brownsville Airport staging ground for firefighters (0)
- 22: Australian ‘Airpark dream goes on display’ (1)
- 25: Buying & Selling Airpark Properties (21)
- 27: Airpark hopes in California (0)
- June 2008 (9)
- 03: Q&A – Converting farm strip (0)
- 05: Should commercial operators on residential airparks pay more than other residents? (0)
- 10: Forum presentations at fly-ins (0)
- 10: Info on airparks in Arizona (1)
- 17: Setting HOA dues or assessments (1)
- 30: WSJ quotes Living With Your Plane (0)
- 30: Information about Airparks by state (1)
- 30: Homer (Alaska) airpark project runs into opposition (0)
- 30: Info on Airparks in Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut & Delaware (1)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (3)
- 01: Home exchange program for pilots (1)
- 24: (0)
- 28: How do you keep non-pilots from buying on airpark? (4)
- December 2007 (5)
- November 2007 (10)
- 05: How does the IRS treat funds your HOA is accumulating for a major project? (0)
- 07: Airpark uses flashing pilot controller to activate flashing light on joint use taxiway (0)
- 09: Interested in a regional association of fly-in communities? (0)
- 12: Wanted: Partners / investors interested in developing future airparks (5)
- 14: More airpark links added to LWYP website; nearly 150 available (0)
- 19: Thru-the-fence agreements questioned again (0)
- 21: Are homeowner fees enough to meet all costs? (0)
- 26: Survey seeks info on airpark liability insurance (1)
- 28: Need an on-site architect for your airpark project? (0)
- 28: Please complete the insurance survey (0)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (2)
- August 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (2)
- June 2007 (3)
- 12: Got any thoughts on hangar doors? (15)
- 23: How safe are joint use taxiways? (0)
- 29: Airparks under construction / in planning (0)
- May 2007 (2)
- 01: Sun ’n Fun forums had good participation (0)
- 07: Do horse farms and airparks mix? (22)
- April 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (4)
- 03: Residential Airparks forums at Sun ‘n Fun (0)
- 08: Sun ’n Fun Forum schedule (0)
- 19: Latest Airpark Demographics Info (0)
- 26: Homeowners insurance (3)
- January 2007 (4)
- 16: Know of airpark at Part 139 airport (0)
- 16: Are you reading the comments? (0)
- 16: Airparks on public-use airports (2)
- 25: Avigation Easement (0)
- October 2006 (2)
- 16: Runway lighting controller on the fritz (3)
- 26: Hangar financing sought (2)
- September 2006 (1)
- 24: Fatal Accident (0)
- August 2006 (3)
- 15: Letter: Ideas on property valuations (0)
- 15: Ideas for valuing property (1)
- 26: Experienced developer wanted (3)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (3)
- 05: AAAE hears about Residential Airparks (2)
- 22: Appraisal info needed (1)
- 29: Appraisal idea (0)
- April 2006 (1)
- 17: Conflicts on airparks (1)
- March 2006 (1)
- 22: Survey results: Homeowner fees (3)
- February 2006 (1)
- 02: Real estate survey results (1)
- November 2005 (2)
- 15: Building a Residential Airpark (9)
- 27: FINDING AN APPRAISER (2)
- October 2005 (5)
- 07: Appraisers needed (0)
- 10: Needs VASI plans, specs (12)
- 18: Are airpark lots exceeding demands? (9)
- 26: General Aviation Security Act of 2005 (2)
- 26: Self-certification more important now (1)
- September 2005 (3)
- 05: Disaster Planning (0)
- 19: Residential Airpark Security (1)
- 19: Airpark Security Self Certification (1)
- August 2005 (1)
- 12: Another view on HOA’s (1)
- July 2005 (2)
- 05: Emergency Use of Airpark (0)
- 28: Homeowner Associations: Pro & Con (0)
- May 2005 (1)
- 07: Enforcing the CC&Rs (2)
- April 2005 (2)
- 07: Airpark CC&R Safety Violations Survey (4)
- 16: Recreational Vehicles (2)
- March 2005 (1)
- 17: Developer sought (1)
- February 2005 (1)
- January 2005 (1)
- December 2004 (2)
- 17: States Licensing Airparks (1)
- 17: Accidents at your airpark? (0)
- November 2004 (1)
- 06: Joint use of Roads & Runways (7)
- October 2004 (1)
- 08: Airparks on Public Airports (3)
- September 2004 (1)
- 20: Blocking ‘Public’ areas (0)
- August 2004 (3)
- 18: Are the rules right for you? (0)
- 19: We need help on our lighting controller (2)
- 28: Lack of Development Can Hurt (0)
- July 2004 (1)
- 07: Homeowners’ Association woes (0)
- June 2004 (31)
- 06: LWYP newsletter changes coming in July (0)
- 07: Have you done your airpark safety checks this year? (0)
- 07: Are you a professional? Your help is needed! (2)
- 07: Security and fire codes are issues facing airparks (0)
- 10: You need special rules for kids on airpark (0)
- 10: How Do You Enforce Rules That You’ve Adopted? (0)
- 10: Flybys a Continuing Issue (0)
- 10: Low Passes Precautionary (0)
- 10: Approach aids (0)
- 10: Who paves the street? (0)
- 10: Through the fence (0)
- 10: Taxiing across roads (0)
- 10: Use of roads and taxiways (0)
- 10: Grass runway info (0)
- 10: Sporty’s Real Estate Shop (0)
- 10: Planning for Airpark (0)
- 10: Maintenance Q&A (0)
- 10: Pilot Country Estates planning paid off (0)
- 10: Lots of questions in buying / living on airport (0)
- 10: Arizona, Wisonsin projects (0)
- 10: Got a fuel tank on your property? (0)
- 10: Runway Classification Q&A (0)
- 10: Big Arizona project planned (0)
- 10: DigiWx offers low cost system (0)
- 10: Developer seeks to lease public land for airpark homes (1)
- 10: Featured Airpark – Leisureland (0)
- 10: Marking unpaved runways (0)
- 10: Grass runway circular (1)
- 10: Paving streets (0)
- 10: Help needed on grass runway (0)
- 10: Airpark getting GPS Approach (1)
- May 2004 (5)
- April 2004 (2)
- March 2004 (2)
